MACDONALD | FERNANDEZ LLP

www.macfern.com

221 Sansome Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 362-0449
Facsimile: (415) 394-5544
914 Thirteenth Street
Modesto, CA 95354
Telephone: (209)549-7949
Facsimile: (209) 236-0172

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Bankruptcy Crimes

Join Reno Fernandez, Chair of the Bar Association of San Francisco's Commercial Law & Bankruptcy Section, for this white-linen lunch program:

BANKRUPTCY CRIMES
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Noon to 1:30 pm

Speakers 


Hon. Stephen L. Johnson, Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division


Joseph Fazioli, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice 


Jeffrey L. Bornstein, Partner, K&L Gates


Emily S. Keller, Trial Attorney, U.S. Trustee’s Office


Moderator


Ivo Keller, Associate, Buchalter Nemer


Topics


• A discussion of the intersection between the bankruptcy code and criminal law


• How attorneys should respond when they see evidence of potential criminal conduct


• Considerations affecting public prosecutors’ handling of allegations of fraud and other crimes in bankruptcy cases


Location


Le Meridien Hotel 
333 Battery Street 
San Francisco, CA 


Please RSVP to: http://tinyurl.com/oc3gbuw


Thank you for supporting the Section.  See you there!


Bankruptcy Crimes

Join Reno Fernandez, Chair of the Bar Association of San Francisco's Commercial Law & Bankruptcy Section, for this white-linen lunch program:

BANKRUPTCY CRIMES
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Noon to 1:30 pm

Speakers 


Hon. Stephen L. Johnson, Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division


Joseph Fazioli, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice 


Jeffrey L. Bornstein, Partner, K&L Gates


Emily S. Keller, Trial Attorney, U.S. Trustee’s Office


Moderator


Ivo Keller, Associate, Buchalter Nemer


Topics


• A discussion of the intersection between the bankruptcy code and criminal law


• How attorneys should respond when they see evidence of potential criminal conduct


• Considerations affecting public prosecutors’ handling of allegations of fraud and other crimes in bankruptcy cases


Location


Le Meridien Hotel 
333 Battery Street 
San Francisco, CA 


Please RSVP to: http://tinyurl.com/oc3gbuw


Thank you for supporting the Section.  See you there!


Thursday, May 16, 2013

Macdonald | Fernandez LLP Congratulates the California Bankruptcy Forum on 25 Years of Excellence!

We are happy to be attending the California Bankruptcy Forum's Insolvency Conference, which kicks off today.  Congratulations to the CBF on its 25th anniversary!

Monday, May 13, 2013

Kodak Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan Faces Challenges, Requests forAppointment of Retiree and Shareholder Committees

A shareholder in Eastman Kodak Co. has filed a significant objection to the company's chapter 11 reorganization plan, which provides for the effective elimination of the company's stock.  Shareholder Matthew Glassman argues that equity holders need representation in the case and that the reorganization plan “is a blatant attempt to rob both the shareholders and unsecured debt and bond holders of money and shares that are rightfully theirs.” Kodak is also facing challenges by retirees, and the bankruptcy court has set a hearing for June 20, 2013, to consider creating an official committee of retirees in connection with unfunded retirement programs Kodak eliminated when it filed for bankruptcy.  Read more here.

Friday, May 10, 2013

Jefferson County Bondholders May Face Losses

Jefferson County, Alabama, announced yesterday that it will file a chapter 9 reprganization plan by late June, 2013, to exit bankruptcy. Jefferson County may become the first large local government since the 1930's to impose losses upon its bondholders. Read more here.

Thursday, May 9, 2013

CFPB Recommends More Flexible Approach to Private Student Loan Debt

Yesterday, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to create more flexible repayment plans for private student loans.  These loans are $150 billion of the current $1 trillion in outstanding student loan debt.  The CFPB proposes that borrowers who pay on time should be allowed to refinance at lower interest rates, whereas borrowers who default should be provided with income-based repayment plans.  The CFPB urges lenders to implement those recommendations now.  The CFPB also proposed that a rehabilitation program available for federal student loan debt be extended to private loans.  Read more here.

Monday, November 14, 2011

“Me First!” California Appellate Court Rules Two Liens Recorded Simultaneously Have Equal Priority

In First Bank v. East West Bank, 2011 Westlaw 4908756 (Cal.App.), California’s Second District Court of Appeal ruled that two deeds of trust against real property marked “recorded” at exactly the same moment have equal priority, notwithstanding the fact that one was indexed first.

This case arises from a scam in which the borrower, Kyung Ha Chung, obtained two loans from two different banks on the same day, without telling the other what he was doing. Each bank believed it would be in first position. Both banks waited about a week to record their deeds of trust, which were delivered to the recorder’s office on the same day before business hours. When the recorder’s office opened at 8:00 am, both deeds of trust were marked “recorded” as of 8:00 am, although they were indexed approximately 4 hours apart. First Bank’s lien was indexed second, and East West Bank sued for declaratory relief. In the meantime, Chung absconded with the money.

In holding that the liens share equal priority, the court explained that neither lien was the “first duly recorded” pursuant to the recording statute. East West Bank argued that the time of indexing should be used as a “tiebreaker,” but the court found that the statute provides for recording and indexing as separate duties of the recorder, with recording establishing priority, not indexing.

The court’s ruling may be technically incorrect. Specifically, Chung could not have executed both deeds of trust simultaneously (in fact, he probably attended two separate signings). The deed of trust executed earlier in time would prevail under common law, and the recording statute would not invalidate the lien because neither bank was the first to record.

This case provides two practical warnings: First, record as soon as possible. It is not clear why the banks both waited about a week to record, but either one could have avoided losing priority by recording promptly. Second, when multiple deeds of trust are to be executed simultaneously, be sure to provide proper recording instructions.

(Also seen on Insight Into Banking)